Sengel v. IGT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this court will affirm the district court's decision if it reaches the right result, even if for the wrong reasons
• stating that this court will affirm a district court decision if it reaches the correct decision, even if for the wrong reason
• explaining that an appellate court will affirm a district court's decision if the district court reached the correct result, but for the wrong reasoi/ COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 39 (0
• explaining that an appellate court will affirm a district court's decision if the district court reached the correct result, but for the wrong reason. COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 39 (0
• affirming the district court decision because it reached the correct result, even though the district court applied the wrong standard
• upholding the gaming control board’s denial of a jackpot to the plaintiff after a slot machine’s reels stopped in a jackpot alignment due to a malfunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).