State v. Lueck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that facts on liability were not necessarily relevant to jurisdictional inquiry and did not affect court’s jurisdiction to hear the case
• stating that facts on liability were not necessarily relevant to jurisdictional inquiry and did not affect court = s jurisdiction to hear the case
• “[Fjacts pertaining to whether the Department may be found liable under the Whistlebower Act are neither dispositive of, nor relevant to, our jurisdictional inquiry.”
• “While this evidence [good faith and appropriate law enforcement authority] may negate the Department’s liability under the Whistle-blower Act, it would not, even if true, affect the district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).