Texas a & M University System v. Koseoglu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suit against state official in his official capacity is merely “another way of pleading an action against the entity of which [the official] is an agent”
• holding that section 51.014(a)(8) allows official-capacity defendants to bring interlocutory appeal of order denying plea to jurisdiction
• holding that nonmovant faced with plea to the jurisdiction “deserves the opportunity to amend his pleadings if the defects can be 11 cured”
• holding that a “state official sued in his official capacity” may appeal orders denying their pleas to the jurisdiction under section 51.014(a)(8)
• holding that the nonmovant faced with a plea to the jurisdiction “deserves the opportunity to amend his pleadings if the defects can be cured”
• holding that appellate court has jurisdiction over state official’s interlocutory appeal of trial court’s denial of plea to the jurisdiction in defense of official capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).