Helena Chemical Co. v. Wilkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in a DTPA case, non-expert testimony may provide legally sufficient evidence to establish causation and exclude alternative causes
• holding that evidence of past net profits coupled with facts and circumstances of future costs was sufficient to support award of estimated future profits
• holding that evidence of past net profits coupled with facts and circumstances of future costs was sufficient to support award of estimated future profits
• holding that, in determining 17 See Schroeder, 813 S.W .2d at 488 (concluding that “exhaustion of administrative remedies is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a civil action alleging violations of the [Act]”
• holding that representations regarding specific future crop yields were more than puffery
• holding that representations regarding specific future crop yields were more than puffery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).