Skip to main content

Cross v. State

Citations

  • 374 A.2d 620
  • 36 Md. App. 502
  • 1977 Md. App. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where defendant found guilty of grand larceny and of receiving the same stolen goods, verdicts could not be sustained
  • where defendant found guilty of grand larceny and of receiving the same stolen goods, verdicts could not be sustained
  • where jury found defendant guilty of grand larceny and also receiving the same stolen goods, the general verdicts of guilty were inconsistent and will not be sustained
  • where defendant found guilty of grand larceny and of receiving the same stolen goods, verdicts could not be sustained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Powers, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.