Skip to main content

Mosley v. State

Citations

  • 198 So. 3d 58
  • 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16726
  • 2015 WL 6777209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that incidents of misconduct occurring after the charged offense, some of which did not result in charges or arrests, were impermissible sentencing factors
  • holding that “the sentence, and record before us reflect that the court did not completely foreclose its consideration of the [subsequent misconduct]” where trial court remarked that it was primarily looking at the charged offense but that it may have also considered other factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucas, Kelly, Sleet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.