Ninth Circuit· 6/15/2001

Cramer v. Consolidated Freightways Inc.

Citations

255 F.3d 683
2001 WL 668923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[A]l-leging a hypothetical connection between the claim and the terms of the CBA is not enough to preempt the claim: adjudication of the claim must require interpretation of a provision of the CBA.”
“[A]lleging a hypothetical 11 connection between the claim and the terms of the CBA is not enough to preempt the 12 claim: adjudication of the claim must require interpretation of a provision of 13 the CBA.”
“[E]vidence of such a waiver would need to be ‘clear and unmistakable’ before a court could even consider whether to give it effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Gould, McKeown, Paez, Pregerson, Reinhardt, Scannlain, Schroeder, Tallman, Tashima, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cramer v. Consolidated Freightways Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.