Lee v. EDEN MEDICAL CENTER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intervening event negated any inference that plaintiff’s protected activity caused the subsequent adverse action
• “[Plaintiff] alleges stray remarks and offhand comments which do not rise to the lével óf a hostile work environment.”
• an intervening event 18 “negate[d] any inference that Plaintiff’s complaint caused the subsequent adverse action”
• “This intervening event negates 11 any inference that Plaintiff's complaint caused the subsequent adverse action”
• “[Plaintiff] alleges 4 stray remarks and offhand comments which do not rise to the level of a hostile work 5 environment.”
• same-day temporal proximity insufficient where an intervening event occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).