Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 3/15/1995

Cram v. Lamson & Sessions Co.

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 466
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4927
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,491
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 449
  • 1995 WL 107502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs subjective belief that defendant had threatened job retaliation did not state a claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Loken, Magill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Cram v. Lamson & Sessions Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.