Rhonda Callanan v. Marvin T. Runyun, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the district court “that the conduct to which [the plaintiff] was subjected was not ‘frequent, severe, physically threatening, or humiliating’ ”
• using knew or should have known standard where United States Postal Service employee sued the United States Postal Service for hostile environment sexual harassment caused mainly by her supervisors
• using knew or should have known standard where United States Postal Service employee sued the United States Postal Service for hostile environment sexual harassment caused mainly by her supervisors
• noting district court did not abuse discretion in limiting some testimony about the defendant’s other acts of discrimination “perhaps most importantly” because the evidentiary ruling was not a blanket, pretrial exclusion
• noting district court did not abuse discretion in limiting some testimony about the defendant’s other acts of discrimination \perhaps most importantly\ because the evidentiary ruling was not a blanket, pretrial exclusion
• using knew or should have known standard where United States Postal Service employee sued the United States Postal Service for hostile 5 The elements include: (1) plaintiff is in a protected group; (2) plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).