Gloria S. Carter v. Chrysler Corporation United Auto Workers, Local 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's knowledge of offensive graffiti, gained through hearsay, was relevant to whether hostile work environment existed and whether plaintiff reasonably perceived other conduct to be abusive or hostile
• finding evidence that plaintiff experienced a “host of indignities” over the course of some two years
• stating \racial epithets are often the basis for racial harassment claims . . . and may likewise create an inference that racial animus motivated other conduct as well.\
• Plaintiff knew of graffiti \during the time in which she experienced harassment. It is thus relevant on whether a hostile work environment existed . . . .\
• “[R]acial epithets are often the basis of racial harassment claims, and may ... create an inference that racial animus motivated other conduct as well.”
• “[Racial epithets are often the basis of racial harassment claims, and may ... create an inference that racial animus motivated other conduct as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).