Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disrespect and ostracism did not rise to the level of actionable adverse employment action because there was no tangible change in duties or working conditions
• holding hostility and personal animus directed toward plaintiffs by supervisors did not rise to level of adverse employment action, absent evidence of more tangible change in duties or working conditions that constituted material employment disadvantage
• “not everything that makes an employee unhappy is an actionable adverse action”
• evidence of employer hostility, disrespect, and ostracism towards employees insufficient to demonstrate an “adverse employment action that constitutes the sort of ultimate employment decision intended to be actionable under Title VII”
• finding hostility by coworkers was not adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).