Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 12/29/2006
Cox v. State
Citations
- 2006 OK CR 51
- 152 P.3d 244
- 2006 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53
- 2006 WL 3861070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a defendant to move to withdraw his plea in order to appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chapel, Johnson, Lewis, Lumpkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thacker v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2012-04-23· cited 60×
- WEEKS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2015-11-23· cited 36×
- DEO v. PARISHCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2023-12-14· cited 19×
- STATE v. VINCENTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-03-23· cited 17×
- TOLLETT v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-07-15· cited 15×
- State v. SalathielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-09-30· cited 10×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-09-15· cited 8×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2009-10-29· cited 8×
- City of Norman v. TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2008-07-11· cited 3×
- CHAMPION v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-03-19· cited 2×
- In re Adoption of the 2012 Revisions to Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-CriminalCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-08-07· cited 1×
- RICKER V. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-10-13· cited 1×
- IN RE ADOPTION OF 2015 REVISIONS TO OKLAHOMA JURY INSTRUCTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2015-08-26
- IN RE: ADOPTION OF THE 2022 REVISIONS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL (SECOND EDITION)Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-08-29
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 356×
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 217×
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-04-30· cited 118×
- State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-08-01· cited 105×
- State v. DuffyMontana Supreme Court· 2000-07-18· cited 57×
- People v. MassarellaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-12-18· cited 56×
- Medlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-09-30· cited 50×
- People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1973-01-26· cited 47×
- People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-12-16· cited 44×
- Longhibler v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-06-30· cited 42×
- Hagar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-09-27· cited 42×
- Ocampo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-07-27· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-27· cited 38×
- United States v. Paul A. TaliaferroTenth Circuit· 1992-11-16· cited 35×
- United States v. Cathy CooperTenth Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 33×
- Christmas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-06-12· cited 33×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-05-24· cited 29×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-05-10· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.