Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 138 N.H. 508
  • 643 A.2d 946
  • 1994 N.H. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 404(b) did not apply to threats defendant made to victim because the threats “were a material part of the entire course of conduct surrounding the commission of the alleged [aggravated felonious sexual assaults]”
  • affirming decision to admit defendant’s threats to victim, which included statements that defendant killed victim’s dog, because threats “were a material part of the entire course of conduct surrounding the commission of the alleged” aggravated felonious sexual assaults
  • explaining, in response to challenge to prosecutor’s opening statement, that to justify a mistrial, remarks or the conduct of counsel must be more than merely inadmissible; they must constitute an irreparable injustice that cannot be cured by a jury instruction
  • Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) does not apply to gambling records inextricably intertwined with evidence of crime charged
  • evidence that the defendant abused and killed the victim’s pets established “the very threat that coerced the victim to comply with the defendant’s demands”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.