Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/27/1989
Commonwealth v. Johnson
Citations
- 553 A.2d 897
- 520 Pa. 165
- 1989 Pa. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that new law which extended statute of limitations from two years to five years was not applied in a retroactive manner to the appellant because a criminal statute of limitations is an act of legislative grace and not of right
- amended statute of limitations was not retroactively applied where the original statutory period had not yet expired
- amendment extending statute of limitations for rape from two to five years applied to all prosecutions which were not already time barred under former two year limitations period
- amendment extending statute of limitations for rape from two to five years applied to all prosecutions which were not already time barred under former two year limitations period
- “Only where a vested right or contractual obligation is involved is a statute applied ‘retroactively’ when it is applied to a condition existing on its effective date which resulted from events which occurred prior to that date.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-02· cited 204×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-12· cited 81×
- State v. CookmanOregon Supreme Court· 1996-08-15· cited 59×
- Alexander v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-15· cited 45×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Childs, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-07-19· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. PurcellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-21· cited 34×
- State v. MoralesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-06-04· cited 32×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-12-29· cited 29×
- State v. CasarettoMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-11-05· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-25· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. RidingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-06-11· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-11· cited 17×
- Doe v. RoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-23· cited 17×
- State v. PetrucelliSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-03-22· cited 16×
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Candelario AyalaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-11-08· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. PresleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-16· cited 4×
- Com. v. Martz, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-28· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. WelshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-15· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-11-17
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-05-27· cited 109×
- State v. HodgsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-03· cited 26×
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-05-06· cited 23×
- United States v. KurzenknabeD. New Jersey· 1955-12-02· cited 21×
- People v. SampleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-11-20· cited 20×
- Rose v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-08-13· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. GuimentoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. BaysoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-03· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 12×
- Rubin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.