Skip to main content

Stevenson v. State

Citations

  • 222 Md. App. 118
  • 112 A.3d 959
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that cell phone location evidence was not novel scientific evidence requiring hearing similar to Porter hearing under Maryland law
  • evidence of recent “physically abusive acts” against victim had special relevance in showing motive because such evidence “‘was probative of a continuing hostility and animosity’” toward victim, “not simply the propensity to commit murder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Nazarian, Leahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.