City of Bloomington v. Kuruzovich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the city owed public-park invitees “a duty to design the park safely”
• the decision to put in a ballfield in a municipal park was discretionary, but the subsequent design and maintenance decisions were ministerial
• “Here, Bloomington maintained Sherwood Oaks Park as a city park open to the general public. In doing so, Bloomington incurred a duty to design the park safely and keep it free from hazards.”
• “Here, Bloomington maintained Sherwood Oaks Park as a city park open to the general public. In doing so, Bloomington incurred a duty to design the park safely and keep it free from hazards.”
• visitor to city park is a public invitee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).