Skip to main content

Corley v. State

Citations

  • 840 S.E.2d 391
  • 308 Ga. 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Q]uestions not use its brief to expand its enumeration of errors by arguing the incorrectness of a trial court ruling not mentioned in the enumeration of errors.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “Corley did not object to these comments [i.e., the prosecutor’s allegedly improper comments to the jury] at trial, so this enumeration of error is not properly before our Court for review.”
  • “The jury is free to reject any evidence in support of a justification defense and to accept the evidence that the shooting was not done in self- defense.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[Q]uestions about the existence of justification are for a jury to decide[.]”
  • “[The jury] was well aware that Corley was interested in contacting law enforcement just prior to the shooting, and the testimony of a second neighbor about this interest would have had little probative value and would have been needlessly cumulative.”
  • “[I]t is within a trial court’s discretion to determine if a party is improperly attempting to use extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness by contradiction under [Rule 621] on a matter collateral to the relevant issues at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.