Skip to main content

Sconyers v. State

Citations

  • 901 S.E.2d 170
  • 318 Ga. 855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant failed to show plain error with regard to the trial court’s pattern charge on prior difficulties, in part, because the defendant “pointed to no controlling precedent holding that a trial court erred in connection with the pattern charge on prior difficulties”
  • witnesses’ denial of conversation occurring “relieved the prosecutor of the need to ask about specific statements”
  • no plain error in admitting evidence of “prior difficulties” consisting of arguments and physical altercations between the defendant and the victim
  • “For an error to be obvious for purposes of plain error review, it must be plain under controlling precedent or in view of the unequivocally clear words of a statute or rule.” (cleaned up)
  • “For an error to be obvious for purposes of plain error review, it must be plain under controlling precedent or in view of the unequivocally clear words of a statute or rule.” (punctuation omitted) (quoting Grier v. State, 313 Ga. 236, 242 (3) (b) (869 SE2d 423) (2022))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.