Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 848 S.E.2d 448
  • 309 Ga. 764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Assessing cumulative prejudice is necessary only when multiple errors have been shown . . . .”
  • “Assessing cumulative prejudice is necessary only when multiple errors have been shown, and [the appellant] has not established even one instance in which trial counsel was deficient.”
  • rejecting the defendant’s fatal variance claim in part because the defendant failed to show “how the indictment impaired his ability to present a defense”
  • “Assessing cumulative prejudice is necessary only when multiple errors have been shown.”
  • “Assessing cumulative prejudice is necessary only when multiple errors have been shown.”
  • “Assessing cumulative prejudice is necessary only when multiple errors have been shown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.