Copia Communications, LLC v. Amresorts, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that defendant’s mailing of contract nonrenewal notice to plaintiffs “registered office” in Massachusetts was insufficient to confer jurisdiction
• explaining that contacts are not relevant to the specific jurisdiction analysis unless claims arise out of or relate to those contacts
• finding that fact that defendant sent notice of nonrenewal to plaintiff’s registered office in Massachusetts did not support finding of purposeful availment
• noting that “Massachusetts’s long-arm statute might impose more restrictive limits on the exercise of personal jurisdiction than does the Constitution”
• explaining that contacts are not relevant to the specific jurisdiction analysis unless claims arise out of or relate to those contacts
• noting that “[r]ecently, however, we have suggested that Massachusetts's long-arm statute might impose more restrictive limits on the exercise of personal jurisdiction than does the Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).