Skip to main content
First Circuit· 12/5/2007

Adelson v. Hananel

Citations

  • 510 F.3d 43
  • 26 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1689
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28033
  • 2007 WL 4247637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the district court did not err in concluding that Israel is the preferable forum given Israel’s stronger connection to the instant case”
  • noting that where the plaintiff is not a Massachusetts domiciliary, Massachusetts is still deemed a home forum where the alternative is foreign
  • stating that \a heavy presumption weighs in favor of [a U.S. citizen plaintiff's] initial \ choice
  • explaining that “contacts must be voluntary and not based on the unilateral actions of another party”
  • finding that the “relatedness” element was met because the employment contract at issue “was formalized and entered into during [defendant’s] December 5, 1995 trip to Massachusetts”
  • finding that the “relatedness” element was met because the employment contract at issue “was formalized and entered into during [defendant’s] December 5, 1995 trip to Massachusetts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Fusté

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Adelson v. Hananel

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.