First Circuit· 5/9/2024
Rosenthal v. Bloomingdales.com, LLC
Citations
- 101 F.4th 90
Oral argument
- ListenArgued35 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Bloomingdale’s commissioning of Session Replay Code to deploy on the Bloomingdales.com website was not a sufficient linkage with the State of Massachusetts to support the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction
- explaining that we \mine the relevant facts\ from \whatever supplemental filings . . . are contained in the record\ (quoting Baskin-Robbins, 825 F.3d at 34) (emphasis added)
- relying on Chen in holding that the plaintiff had failed to establish that the defendant had \intentionally target[ed] users in [the forum state]\
- explaining that although the reach of the Massachusetts long-arm statute may not be identical to that of the Due Process Clause, the court need not inquire into such distinctions when the plaintiff has not satisfied the constitutional minimum demanded by due process
- explaining that although the reach of the Massachusetts long-arm statute may not be identical to that of the Due Process Clause, the court need not inquire into such distinctions when the plaintiff has not satisfied the constitutional minimum demanded by due process
- \[The defendant's] website allow[s] a user to search for nearby stores by providing the user's location.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 3,814×
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoFirst Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nFirst Circuit· 1998-04-27· cited 625×
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoFirst Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 597×
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.First Circuit· 1992-06-05· cited 493×
- Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox CanadaFirst Circuit· 1995-02-09· cited 449×
- United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.First Circuit· 2001-12-27· cited 427×
- Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc.First Circuit· 2009-10-22· cited 370×
- Phillips Exeter Academy v. Howard Phillips Fund, Inc.First Circuit· 1999-11-19· cited 366×
- John Clark Donatelli v. National Hockey LeagueFirst Circuit· 1990-01-12· cited 301×
- Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC v. Alpenrose Dairy, Inc.First Circuit· 2016-06-06· cited 225×
- A Corp. v. All American Plumbing, Inc.First Circuit· 2016-01-27· cited 205×
- United Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue). v. 163 Pleasant Street CorporationFirst Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 163×
- Northern Laminate Sales, Inc. v. DavisFirst Circuit· 2005-04-01· cited 143×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.