D. Massachusetts· 12/8/2017
Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLC
Citations
- 280 F. Supp. 3d 258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[a] plaintiff must prevail on all three prongs to establish specific jurisdiction” (citing Mukarker v. City of Philadelphia, 178 F. Supp. 3d 8, 10 (D. Mass. 2016)
- “The Court must analyze the jurisdictional issue based on the officer’s personal contacts with Massachusetts.” (emphasis in original)
- first citing J. McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873, 880 (2011), then citing Burnham v. Super. Court of Cal., 495 U.S. 604, 619 (1990)
- first citing J. McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873, 880 (2011), then citing Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604, 703 (1982)
- first citing J. McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873, 880 (2011), then citing Burnham v. Super. Court of Cal., 495 U.S. 604, 619 (1990)
- “Because [plaintiff] failed to make sufficient factual allegations to show any personal in-forum contacts of the Individual Defendants, this Court could not find personal jurisdiction on the basis of [their] activities as company owners or managers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,478×
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court· 2013-12-03· cited 3,278×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court· 1991-04-17· cited 1,405×
- J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 953×
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 772×
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 683×
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nFirst Circuit· 1998-04-27· cited 625×
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoFirst Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 597×
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellFirst Circuit· 1995-12-05· cited 587×
- Valentin-De-Jesus v. United HealthcareFirst Circuit· 2001-06-27· cited 527×
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.First Circuit· 1992-06-05· cited 493×
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsFirst Circuit· 2002-06-17· cited 432×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.