S.D. New York· 12/6/2013
Contant v. Sabol
Citations
- 987 F. Supp. 2d 323
- 2013 WL 6425006
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where, as here, a petitioner seeks habeas review of an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim under the test announced in Strickland, review is ‘doubly deferential.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davison, Karas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court· 1982-03-08· cited 5,808×
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 5,336×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court· 2005-04-27· cited 4,510×
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,309×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 3,974×
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 3,877×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court· 2007-05-14· cited 3,241×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.