M.D. Florida· 7/18/2007
Conax Florida Corp. v. Astrium Ltd.
Citations
- 499 F. Supp. 2d 1287
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51854
- 2007 WL 2083582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- authorizing service by mail upon finding that “Article 10(a) is applicable to service of process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas G. Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maloney-Refaie v. Bridge at School, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2008-07-09· cited 37×
- TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. BittonS.D. Florida· 2012-01-11· cited 16×
- TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Bequator Corp., Ltd.S.D. Florida· 2010-06-11· cited 12×
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Pak China Group Co.S.D. Florida· 2012-02-06· cited 12×
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. HernandezS.D. Florida· 2015-09-02· cited 10×
- Intelsat Corp. v. MULTIVISION TV LLCS.D. Florida· 2010-08-24· cited 8×
- Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Medica Healthcare Plans, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2019-04-29· cited 6×
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Sunstrike International Ltd.S.D. Florida· 2011-04-05· cited 6×
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Unlimited PCS Inc.S.D. Florida· 2012-01-11· cited 6×
- Lobo v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2009-09-10· cited 4×
- Portalp International SAS v. ZuloagaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-18· cited 4×
- Atwater v. Light Korean Presbyterian Church (In Re Mak Petroleum, Inc.)M.D. Florida· 2010-02-11· cited 2×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3,642×
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 1,948×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 1,129×
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-03-06· cited 1,102×
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 2004-08-31· cited 383×
- Sculptchair, Inc. v. Century Arts, Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 1996-09-06· cited 284×
- Nuovo Pignone S P A v. Storman Asia MVFifth Circuit· 2002-10-31· cited 221×
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineSecond Circuit· 1986-04-07· cited 211×
- Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1996-03-12· cited 173×
- Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1990-06-04· cited 155×
- Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Supreme Court· 1996-11-12· cited 103×
- Apollo Computer, Inc. v. Helge BergFirst Circuit· 1989-10-25· cited 97×
- Bankston v. Toyota Motor Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1989-11-13· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.