Skip to main content
· 8/31/2004

Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.

Citations

  • 383 F.3d 798
  • 2004 A.M.C. 2269
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18349
  • 2004 WL 1936395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 governs service of a summons and complaint in federal district court
  • holding that a plaintiff “must obtain prior court approval” before attempting substituted service under Rule 4(f)(3)
  • holding that plaintiffs 22 may serve defendants internationally through means other than the 23 state’s central authority only if the state does not object to the alternative means
  • noting that foreign courts are \essentially unanimous\ in the view \that the meaning of 'send' in Article 10(a) includes 'serve' \
  • stating that 2 plaintiffs “must obtain prior court approval for the alternative method of serving process.”
  • explaining that a party 25 needs “prior court approval for the alternative method of serving process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silverman, Fletcher, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.