Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Citations

  • 934 A.2d 1191
  • 594 Pa. 106
  • 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the admissibility of evidence at a sentencing hearing is left to the discretion of the sentencing court
  • recognizing that the admissibility of evidence at a sentencing hearing is left to the discretion of the sentencing court
  • holding that double jeopardy protections did not prevent the State from presenting evidence of youth/school sentencing enhancement when the original sentence was overturned on appeal
  • holding that when appellant’s original sentence was vacated, the sentence was rendered a legal nullity
  • holding double jeopardy protections did not prevent the State from presenting evidence of youth/ school sentencing enhancement where the original sentence was overturned on appeal
  • noting that when an original sentence is vacated, it is rendered a legal nullity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.