Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/14/2000

Commonwealth v. McMullen

Citations

745 A.2d 683
2000 Pa. Super. 38
2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that blanket assertions of error are insufficient to permit meaningful review
stating that “[w]hen the appellant fails to adequately develop his argument, meaningful appellate review is not possible.” (citation omitted)
stating that “[w]hen the appellant fails to adequately develop his argument, meaningful appellate review is not possible.” (citation omitted)
stating that “[w]hen the appellant fails to adequately develop his argument, meaningful appellate review is not possible.” (citation omitted)
stating that “[w]hen the appellant fails to adequately develop his argument, meaningful appellate review is not possible.” (citation omitted)
stating that “[w]hen the appellant fails to 12 To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, an appellant must demonstrate that (1) the underlying legal claim is of arguable merit; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Eakin, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.