Commonwealth v. Bartrug

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a trial court errs in sentencing on one count in a multi-count case, then sentences for all counts must be vacated
• holding that if a trial court errs in sentencing on one count in a multi-count case, then all sentences for all counts must be vacated
• recognizing that resentencing is not outside “the power or jurisdiction” of the PCRA court
• holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing plan on remand
• holding that if a trial court errs in its sentence on one count in a multi-count case, then all sentences for all counts will be vacated so that the court can restructure its entire sentencing scheme
• holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing scheme on remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).