Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 106 A.3d 583
  • 630 Pa. 169
  • 2014 WL 3672870
  • 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a timely notice of appeal, irrespective if it is otherwise defective, triggers the jurisdiction of the appellate court
  • holding that a timely notice of appeal, irrespective if it is otherwise defective, triggers the jurisdiction of the appellate court
  • holding that “the lower court clerk must time-stamp a notice of appeal immediately upon receipt [and] lacks the authority to reject, as defective, a timely notice of appeal”
  • holding that the clerk of courts is “obligated to accept and process notices of appeal upon receipt in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, notwithstanding any perceived defects therein”
  • holding that Commonwealth’s notice of appeal was timely filed where Commonwealth filed notice of appeal within time limit but prothonotary’s office did not docket notice due to defect in filing
  • holding that Commonwealth's notice of appeal was timely filed where (Footnote Continued Next Page

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.