Skip to main content
· 11/26/2003

Commonwealth v. Alaouie

Citations

  • 837 A.2d 1190
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 464
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the prothonotary had no authority to reject an appellant’s timely but defective Notice of Appeal from a summary conviction
  • holding prothonotary had no authority to reject appellant’s timely but defective notice of appeal
  • holding prothonotary had no authority to reject appellant’s timely but defective notice of appeal
  • concluding it was error to dismiss the defendant’s summary appeal -6- J-S32008-16 without entertaining his explanation for its untimeliness and viewing his offer of an explanation as a request for nunc pro tunc relief
  • remanding for evidentiary hearing, construing appellant’s explanation for untimely notice of appeal as request for nunc pro tunc relief
  • viewing appellant’s offer of explanation for untimely appeal as a -7- J-S16030-25 request for nunc pro tunc relief and concluding trial court erred in dismissing summary appeal without entertaining explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Todd, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.