Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 936 A.2d 12
  • 594 Pa. 366
  • 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of the same type of non-charged conduct was admissible to show the :full extent and scope of the conspiracy
  • holding that if trial counsel was not ineffective with respect to claim underlying allegation of ineffectiveness, then appellate counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise claim of trial counsel’s ineffectiveness
  • stating that a jury is presumed to follow the trial court’s instructions
  • counsel not ineffective for failing to foresee changes in law
  • counsel not ineffective for failing to foresee changes in law
  • “this Court has recognized a res gestae exception to Rule 404(b) which allows admission of other crimes evidence when relevant to furnish the context or complete story of the events surrounding a crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.