· 7/22/2003
Nagy v. Best Home Services, Inc.
Citations
- 829 A.2d 1166
- 2003 Pa. Super. 271
- 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a breakdown in the court’s operations warranted nunc pro tunc relief where prothonotary refused to docket a timely-filed notice of appeal, despite the fact that appellant’s Notice (Footnote continued
- “[The t]rial court may grant [] an appeal [nunc pro tunc] only if the delay in filing is caused by extraordinary circumstances.”
- “the term ‘filing’ is not the equivalent of either the prothonotary’s time-stamping of a document or the recording of receipt on the docket”
- “[A] a document is filed when the Prothonotary receives it.”
- “[A] document is filed when the Prothonotary receives it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Klein, Montemuro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.