Skip to main content
· 7/22/2003

Nagy v. Best Home Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 829 A.2d 1166
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 271
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a breakdown in the court’s operations warranted nunc pro tunc relief where prothonotary refused to docket a timely-filed notice of appeal, despite the fact that appellant’s Notice (Footnote continued
  • “[The t]rial court may grant [] an appeal [nunc pro tunc] only if the delay in filing is caused by extraordinary circumstances.”
  • “the term ‘filing’ is not the equivalent of either the prothonotary’s time-stamping of a document or the recording of receipt on the docket”
  • “[A] a document is filed when the Prothonotary receives it.”
  • “[A] document is filed when the Prothonotary receives it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Klein, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.