Day v. Civil Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is more efficient to require the filing of a Sunshine Act challenge within 30 days of an alleged violation rather than after the proceedings are completed
• citing, among other cases, Belitskus v. Hamlin Twp., 764 A.2d 669, 670–71 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2000
• the timeliness of a Sunshine Act challenge implicates the jurisdiction of the reviewing tribunal; failure to timely file the challenge within the confines of Section 713 deprives the reviewing court of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).