Mitchell v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the one year limitation on the payment of retroactive benefits”
• statutory limit was not patently arbitrary and served as a rational means to preserve the fiscal integrity of the social security fund
• strictly applying the statutory limit to a claimant who delayed filing an application for eight years due to ignorance of the availability of disability insurance benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).