Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/24/2012
Commonwealth v. Thompson
Citations
- 39 A.3d 335
- 2012 Pa. Super. 15
- 2012 WL 191661
- 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 16
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, where the trial court has addressed the issues sought to be raised on appeal, we need not remand for the filing of a concise statement nunc pro tunc
- stating that “[w]hen counsel has filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement and the trial court has addressed those issues[,] we need not remand and may address the merits of the issues presented.”
- directing trial court to address an untimely statement without direction for remand to avoid unnecessary delay
- remanding for responsive trial court opinion when Appellant filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement
- stating “[w]hen counsel has filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement and the trial court has addressed those issues we need not remand and may address the merits of the issues presented”
- failure to timely file court-ordered Rule 1925(b) statement constitutes per se ineffective assistance of counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowes, Gantman, Lazarus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. PresleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-17· cited 181×
- Commonwealth v. VeonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-02-06· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-08-09· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. BlauserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-06-28· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. FischereSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-16· cited 32×
- Com. v. Stroud, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-07-10· cited 25×
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-01-26· cited 6×
- Com. v. Echols, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-01-17
- Com. v. Gordon, III, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-01-18
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-29· cited 725×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-13· cited 470×
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-11· cited 418×
- Commonwealth v. AllshouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-19· cited 81×
- Eiser v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-03· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-09-09· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-22· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. AlsopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-14· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.