Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. DeJesus

Citations

  • 868 A.2d 379
  • 581 Pa. 632
  • 2005 Pa. LEXIS 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court’s failure to discuss preserved claims of trial court error required remand to the trial court for issuance of an adequate opinion in accordance with Pa.R.A.P.1925
  • retaining jurisdiction and remanding to the common pleas court for issuance of a Rule 1925(a) opinion within 60 days of issuance of Supreme Court’s opinion
  • stating, where a trial court fails to issue a Rule 1925(a) opinion, “the appellate court is deprived of explication and guidance on those issues from the judicial entity most familiar with the matter.”
  • remanding for a trial court opinion where trial court did not author one
  • purpose of Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) is to facilitate appellate review of a particular trial court order, and provide the parties and the public the legal basis for a judicial decision
  • remanding for preparation of adequate trial court opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.