Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/26/2021
Com. v. Williams, J.
Citations
- 245 A.3d 710
- 2021 Pa. Super. 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting Williams “fails to identify what specific language or content in the letter unduly prejudiced him”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lazarus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. HairstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-01-21· cited 352×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-22· cited 339×
- Commonwealth v. Poplawski, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-29· cited 135×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-24· cited 121×
- Commonwealth v. MaloneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-24· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. Jemison Jr., D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-18· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-20· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-11· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. Noel, H., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-11-21· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-08-08· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-28· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-07-20· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-10· cited 27×
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-01-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.