Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 145 A.3d 184
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 173
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 442
  • 2016 WL 4268478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “where the trial court addresses the issues raised in an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement, we need not remand but (Footnote Continued Next Page
  • explaining that “where the trial court addresses the issues raised in an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement, we need not remand but may address the issues on their merits”
  • stating that “where the trial court addresses the issues raised in an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement, we need not remand but may address the issues on their merits” (citation omitted)
  • exercising discretion to review claims waived by untimely 1925(b) statement when trial court has appropriately addressed the claims in its opinion
  • applying Allshouse to hold defendant’s state probation began only after he was released from federal custody, not when his state term of incarceration ended and his federal custody began
  • stating, “where the trial court addresses the issues raised in an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement, we need not remand but may address the issues on their merits.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Lazarus, Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.