Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/9/2005

Commonwealth v. West

Citations

883 A.2d 654
2005 Pa. Super. 309
2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that per se ineffectiveness does not occur when counsel pursues certain issues in a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement and not others
explaining that per se ineffectiveness does not occur when counsel elected to pursue certain issues in the Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement and omitted others
explaining that per se ineffectiveness does not occur when counsel elected to pursue certain issues in the Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement and omitted others
explaining that per se ineffectiveness does not occur when counsel elected to pursue certain issues in the Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement and omitted others
explaining that per se ineffectiveness does not occur when counsel elected to pursue certain issues in the Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement and omitted others
explaining where counsel failed to file Rule 1925(b) statement, most effective means of restoration is to remand for counsel to file Rule 1925(b) statement and for court to issue supplemental opinion addressing issues raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Joyce, Klein, Lally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.