Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Stewart

Citations

  • 867 A.2d 589
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 28
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim that “the sentencing court considered improper factors” presents a substantial question
  • holding that a substantial question exists when a defendant alleges the sentencing court considered improper factors when imposing an aggravated range sentence
  • holding that a claim asserting “the sentencing court considered improper factors in placing the sentence in the aggravated range … presents a substantial question on appeal[]”
  • holding that a claim asserting “the sentencing court considered improper factors in placing the sentence in the aggravated range … presents a substantial question on appeal[]”
  • holding that a claim asserting “the sentencing court considered improper factors in placing the sentence in the aggravated range ... presents a substantial question on appeal[ ]”
  • stating that a claim that a sentence is excessive because the sentencing court relied on impermissible factors raises a substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lally-Green, Klein, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.