Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hardy

Citations

  • 939 A.2d 974
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 398
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
  • rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence, where defendant stole from a charity and “exploited a high appointment of trust to profit from the misery of our most desperate and the charity of our most generous.”
  • rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence and stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
  • rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence and stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
  • rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence and stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
  • citation Absent a manifest abuse of discretion, such -6- J-S56034-14 sent Commonwealth v. Stewart, 867 A.2d 589, 593 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daniels, McEwen, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.