Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/27/2007
Commonwealth v. Hardy
Citations
- 939 A.2d 974
- 2007 Pa. Super. 398
- 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
- rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence, where defendant stole from a charity and “exploited a high appointment of trust to profit from the misery of our most desperate and the charity of our most generous.”
- rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence and stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
- rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence and stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
- rejecting defendant’s challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence and stating sentencing court is not required “to ignore context and instead review [the] charges in a vacuum, where only the name of the offense and corresponding standard range sentence is considered.”
- citation Absent a manifest abuse of discretion, such -6- J-S56034-14 sent Commonwealth v. Stewart, 867 A.2d 589, 593 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daniels, McEwen, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Commonwealth v. FullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-01· cited 386×
- Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-21· cited 134×
- Commonwealth v. BromleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-29· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. KleinickeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-08· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.