Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/1/2011

Commonwealth v. Stokes

Citations

38 A.3d 846
2011 Pa. Super. 261
2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that claims involving the application of the deadly weapon enhancement are claims challenging the discretionary aspects of a sentence
holding that the totality of the circumstances proved the defendant was aware of, and constructively possessed, the firearm that was discovered in the home
balding that \[ilt is undisputed that a gun can be an instrument of crime\
upholding 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, but opining that the statute would fail if Harris and McMillan were overturned
upholding 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, but opining that the statute would fail if Harris and McMillan were overturned
upholding 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, but opining that the statute would fail if Harris and McMillan were overturned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Freedberg, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.