Skip to main content
· 2/1/2006

Commonwealth v. Fullin

Citations

  • 892 A.2d 843
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 17
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that claim that court failed to consider required factors under Section 9721(b) raises a substantial question
  • concluding that claim that court failed to consider required factors under Section 9721(b) raises a substantial question
  • concluding that the appellant raised a substantial 2 We note that the factors to be considered under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b
  • holding that appellant who challenges condition of probation pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9754 raises a substantial question
  • concluding that the appellant raised a substantial question where it was 3 We note that the factors to be considered under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b
  • concluding that appellant raised substantial question where he argued that, in imposing aggravated-range sentence, court failed to consider his remorse and efforts at rehabilitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Lally-Green, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.