· 2/1/2006
Commonwealth v. Fullin
Citations
- 892 A.2d 843
- 2006 Pa. Super. 17
- 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that claim that court failed to consider required factors under Section 9721(b) raises a substantial question
- concluding that claim that court failed to consider required factors under Section 9721(b) raises a substantial question
- concluding that the appellant raised a substantial 2 We note that the factors to be considered under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b
- holding that appellant who challenges condition of probation pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9754 raises a substantial question
- concluding that the appellant raised a substantial question where it was 3 We note that the factors to be considered under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b
- concluding that appellant raised substantial question where he argued that, in imposing aggravated-range sentence, court failed to consider his remorse and efforts at rehabilitation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Lally-Green, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.