Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Smith

Citations

  • 97 A.3d 782
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 165
  • 2014 WL 3844118
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Commonwealth sustains its burden of disproving self-defense if it establishes, - 11 - J-A29027-24 beyond a reasonable doubt, inter alia, that the accused provoked the use of force
  • holding that the Commonwealth sustains its burden of disproving self-defense if it establishes, beyond a reasonable doubt, inter alia, that the accused had a duty to retreat and the retreat was possible with complete safety
  • stating that a defendant “must be free from fault in provoking or escalating the altercation that led to the offense” (emphasis and citation omitted)
  • stating that even if evidence was inadmissible at a non-jury trial, a trial court, acting as the finder of fact, is presumed to ignore it
  • stating that, an orphans’ court, acting as the fact-finder, is presumed to know the law
  • explaining that the finder of fact is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Panella, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.