Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hall

Citations

  • 830 A.2d 537
  • 574 Pa. 233
  • 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, to be guilty of criminal attempt, a defendant's con scious objective must be to cause the result necessary to the substantive crime
  • noting that due process is implicated “only if, under the facts of the -5- J-S57039-17 Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 10/18/2017 case, there is no rational way the trier could make the connection permitted by the inference.” (citation omitted)
  • stating intent can be found where one verbalizes reasons for his actions
  • evidence fleeing defendant fired gun twice in direction of police sufficient to sustain conviction for aggravated assault
  • “A gun is a lethal weapon; pointing it towards a person, and then discharging it, speaks volumes as to one’s intention.”
  • Intent to 36 \Serious bodily injury\ as used for purposes of robbery pursuant to Section 370l(a)(l)(ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.