Commonwealth v. Bullick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the overwhelming majority of [intoxicated drivers] will make their way safely home,” and holding the “conscious disregard” of the risk requires proof -5- J-S15027-25 beyond mere intoxication
• stating: \What is material is actual reckless driving or conduct...for it is this conduct which creates the peril in question\
• discussing the history of, and relationship between, careless and reckless driving
• willful and wanton level of culpability required for conviction for reckless driving is interpreted identically to recklessness as defined in 18 Pa.C.S.A Section 302(b)(3)
• “[T]he trier of fact while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence.”
• “[T]he trier of fact while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).