Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Harris

Citations

  • 665 A.2d 1172
  • 542 Pa. 134
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defense of self- defense necessarily requires that the appellant admit that the shooting was intentional in order to protect oneself, and that the defense of accident is mutually exclusive with self-defense
  • noting that “the defense of self-defense necessarily requires that the appellant admit that the shooting was intentional in order to protect one’s self”
  • affirming decision not to issue a self-defense instruction where the appellant’s testimony bore out that he confronted the victim first with an unloaded shotgun to scare him, and when the victim did not leave, the appellant proceeded to load his gun and shoot the victim
  • defense of self-defense not permitted because it was mutually exclusive of the defense of accident or mistake
  • defense of self-defense not permitted because it was mutually exclusive of the defense of accident or mistake
  • “[T]he defense of self-defense necessarily requires that the appellant admit that the shooting was intentional in order to protect one’s self.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.