Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/27/2010

Commonwealth v. Smith

Citations

995 A.2d 1143
606 Pa. 127
2010 Pa. LEXIS 1142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding permissible a prosecutor’s statement, that the defense expert was a “hired gun,” where the credibility of his testimony was called into doubt during cross-examination, and where he testified that he primarily worked as a defense expert
recognizing a public defender may not argue ineffectiveness of another attorney in the same public defender’s office, as the subsequent attorney, “in essence, is deemed to have asserted a claim of his or her own ineffectiveness.” (citation omitted, emphasis added)
assessing reasonableness of trial attorney’s stewardship under prevailing professional norms at time of representation
not all confessions or admissions secured from illegally arrested persons are per se inadmissible as trial evidence
“[I]neffectiveness claims are distinct from claims raised on direct appeal, and must be treated as wholly independent of underlying claim of error.”
prosecutor's 30 statements that defense expert was a \hired gun\ was fair comment where the expert had only testified for the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.